Showing posts with label San Diego City Policy Departments Latinos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Diego City Policy Departments Latinos. Show all posts

Friday, May 13, 2011

Show Me the Tax-Payer's Money

Across our nation, from city to city, from State to State, from Post Office to Office of Homeland Security  - 90% of all government jobs (or rather jobs paying more than 100,000 dollars a year in wages and benefits  paid-for with tax-payers' monies) go towards a single group of people. Some citizens think to complain about welfare, some complain about 'welfare mothers'...; but the true cost, the durable cost, and the huge pension costs that expansion with the huge expansion of our national government from 2001 to 2007, comes in the form of  the expense (the social welfare) paid to the group our government calls "white males."
It is a normal tendency for people in power to populate and expand their fields of power who express themselves and think in way like those in power, have a like social and cultural agenda, thus expansion and concentrating the field of power is set to always be majority members to mirror the aesthetics and cosmetology of those holding majority power. This is a natural tendency and if we are to have a truly democratic society, a society that is inclusive and successful and durable, we must include all population at reflective levels, even group representation levels dictated by incomes and earned wages incomes. We have had an exclusive systems, when the majority of day to day governmental power is held in the hand of a less than 5% group 90% of who are members of the group “white males” being blindly supported and kept in place by the single largest population in the United States of America (with the exception of the fast expanding Latino population in regions of our nation) the working poor ‘whites’ (this includes the largest population getting welfare and Medicare benefits).
In places where people care about inclusion and representation* they are, even now, making right the great social wrong of social welfare in the form of high paying police and fire department jobs being given in the super-majority to only one small (and getting smaller ever day) group. And the $100,000 jobs that seem to go to members of their social/cultural fields of power (like city manager…., and School Superintendents), yes, that is right boys and girls, they are also filled almost to the point of exclusive membership with “white males.” As well, safeguarding this system of “white male” entitlement is the FBI, CIA, Department of Homeland Security, and Attorney Generals – also, so it seems populated with about 90% “white males.”
Baby-Boomers: hugely waged and even more Hugely Pension (with  benefits,) and in the condition of elected and appointed positions of power and authority are costing more in costs than the combined wages being paid to more than 60% of the people living in this Nation. Wages and benefits, by the way, no given to them by the citizens but rather taken and given to themselves - without votes or voters’ approval.   From senior staff at the Pentagon to the local seniors in the Police Forces and Fire Departments in San Diego California - it seems some 90% of the tax-payer funded jobs paying more than 100,000 dollars a years (with pensions paying just as much or more per year for the rest of their life) are given to members of this group "White Males."
What is perhaps more harmful to the overall cost of our government structure is the durable cost of the HUGE pension benefits member of this uber-high paid group receive – even after simply being elected into a ‘public’ office - once.  For in 2001, this group of over-paid and even more over-pensioned "white male" super-majority group, killed the Spending Limit Law and gave themselves a tax break. Or as Newt G. said it 'It is time to give the real Americans a tax, the people who make more than 100,000 dollars a year.' Yet even now, the cost to the tax-payers of these pension benefits alone, taken by this group for sometimes longer than they actually 'worked on the job,' puts these tax-payered pensioned government workers/politicos in the top 10% of all wage earners - even in their retirement.
And now, from city to city, from state to state, across our country, the tax-payers are paying (or trying to pay) the costs of keeping these uber-highly paid “white male” not only their salaries (for doing such a fine job running our country) but also for the rest of their long long life’s (for the white male is the longest lived male of any ethnic group.)  So, all you women, people of color, or those others of us who lack the social or political capital to be placed into one of the fully-funded and pensioned and benefited taxpayer supported jobs (with HUGE pensions and benefits), well, that 100,000,000 without medical care are told we are greedy and want something for nothing, those 170,000,000 of us who are unemployed or under-employed are told we are just too lazy to work, and that some 380,000,000 million Americans who make less than 32,000,000 dollars a year – well, we are just to uneducated to get a better paying job – they say. They, those how hold the 90% vast super-majority of all tax-payer funded jobs. And so, now we have cities and states, cutting funding to all social services, to schools, to libraries – simply in their attempts to pay the over-bloated pension benefits that the ‘cream’ going to the people who retired at rates of over 100,000 dollars a year – or rather – the ‘white male.’
There we have it, as global wage scales are set to equalize by about 2040, it is clear that even if the bottom 90% of wage earners in the United State were to be taxed at the total levels of their incomes, that those tax-payers will not be able to cover the basic costs of running our government and pay the HUGE pension and benefits of the government retired males in our shared society.
*
*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_chicago_firefighters_lawsuit

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Representation and Institutional Racism

In 2007 I wrote an email to the city attorney’s office in San Diego. The subject line of the email reads: "Representation and Institutional Racism"
I was concerned about what appeared to be a then in place and apparently structurally supported conditions of institutionalized racism existing in City Council District 4 if not the whole of San Diego City and County. It seems to me, that the talented less than 1% (a play on WEB Dubois’ talented 10 percent) which seemed to hold the super-majority of political, city governmental, and economy/social capital in that city county district were not only contributing to oppressive conditions to the majority of the working class populations of these area; but by seemingly insuring that only members (or in majority mainly members) of a narrowly defined group the talented less than 1% of the group these people seems to be re-presented as representing.
The topic was never, to the best of my knowledge, discussed in a public forum, nor was I contacted as to why the conditions either existed or did not exist, nor was the seeming pervasive existence of these oppressive and exclusionary conditions, to the best of my knowledge, ever corrected so that they meet city policies as I understand them.
From that time, many things have been written about Jim Crow in San Diego California.  Some by the mainstream authorized scholars of local universities staffers, but still the political leadership of all colors and religions – seems to reject any notion of correcting these repressive or exclusive conditions in our shared human environment.
*
I am interested in having you three weigh-in on the topic of representation and what constitutes ‘real efforts to insure representation’ as seems to be mandated by ordinance as well as City Council policies (including but not limited to those few listed below.) This is my effort to gain some understanding as to why it appears we still have a grossly under-represented/unrepresentative group (representation not reflective of demographic data) of our local citizens (the Latinos) in so many of our city departments, City Council District 4, CCDC/SEDC board and senior staffing, and the Encanto Community Planning Group. As well, if By-Laws of any Community Planning Group (or any like group,) can excluded efforts, direction or intentions of any real efforts…, so that the of under-representation / non-represented group (unequal suffrage) is allowed to continue to exist - apparently un-addressed.

During an Encanto Community Planning Group meeting I brought up that it was my understanding that we were to make firm and real attempts to assure demographically-reflective representation and inclusion in the composition of, not only the Encanto Community Planning Group, but also in all groups and departments in the City of San Diego.

Below*, I believe you will find, a few sections of council policies and ordinances which direct such efforts should (perhaps must) be made to have representative inclusion in the Encanto Community Planning Group as well as all City Departments, Boards, Committees…, or Community Planning Groups.

It is my feeling that in supporting groups which are exclusive / have minority population over-representation gives those who presently hold the majority of civic and governmental power - the rights and ability to insure and maintain exclusion, marginalization or the repression of large segments of our diverse population are insured.  I believe that such conditions may represent what could be defined as ‘institutional racism’ - perhaps similar to that of “Poll Tax‘ and ‘Jim Crow Laws’ of post-civil war era, or representative levels lower than the ‘1/3 representation law’ allowed for slaves of the pre-civil war era in certain regions of the United States of America. I believe we should all make efforts that such conditions are not allowed to exist today - anywhere in our City, State, or Nation.

Please respond with the planning department’s / City of San Diego’s position as to the direction, meaning, and application of these council police and ordinances* (as well as other mandates for equal right and representation issued or directed by the State and National governments as they apply to the City of San Diego’s governmental structure) so that I may understand what seems to be an unwillingness or inability to support these council polices and ordinances.

If I am wrong and there is no under-representation of any population or group in the city of San Diego in any board, committee, council, department, or other set however it may be defined - then I offer my most sincerely apologies for my misunderstanding. But if such is the case, that my understanding is in error, I would ask that data supporting claims of “reflective-representation” (such as made in City Council Chambers) be made available to me -- in a way that will allow for me to correct what I believe I have found in my own research and observations.


*(including but not limited to)
Please see #2 under the whereas items.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://docs.sandiego.gov/council_reso_ordinance/rao1988/O-88-185.pdf
Please see #7
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://docs.sandiego.gov/councilpolicies/cpd_300-10.pdf
Here's the policy authority for the Diamond BID, which requires equal opportunity.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://docs.sandiego.gov/councilpolicies/cpd_900-07.pdf
See article II, section 5.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://docs.sandiego.gov/council_reso_ordinance/rao1988/O-88-185.pdf